<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collapsing bridges and Software Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/</link>
	<description>What are the forces behind software development?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:18:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amani</title>
		<link>http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Amani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 23:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>hi i enjoyed the read</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi i enjoyed the read</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herval</title>
		<link>http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>herval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>the only problem here is comparing &#039;software development&#039; with &#039;bridge engineering&#039;, when it actually should be compared to something &#039;non-engineerical&#039;. Just because there&#039;s some degree of formality and math involved, doesn&#039;t mean it is an engineering science: the way we develop software today (and even more with the agile trends), it&#039;s more like writing a screenplay or a novel than building a bridge or a building. Metrics and success rates included...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only problem here is comparing &#8217;software development&#8217; with &#8216;bridge engineering&#8217;, when it actually should be compared to something &#8216;non-engineerical&#8217;. Just because there&#8217;s some degree of formality and math involved, doesn&#8217;t mean it is an engineering science: the way we develop software today (and even more with the agile trends), it&#8217;s more like writing a screenplay or a novel than building a bridge or a building. Metrics and success rates included&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mnemetica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pontes, Engenharia, e Software</title>
		<link>http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>mnemetica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pontes, Engenharia, e Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 01:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecreation.org/2007/collapsing-bridges-and-software-development/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] de um&#160;post interessante, sobre Software e baseado no acidente da I-35W, a ponte que caiu. Major bridges collapse every 30 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de um&nbsp;post interessante, sobre Software e baseado no acidente da I-35W, a ponte que caiu. Major bridges collapse every 30 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
